Los multipeligros y el riesgo sistémico de las emergencias y desastres en la Multidimensionalidad de la Seguridad Nacional

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58211/cdt.vi22.43

Keywords:

Multihazards, Disaster risk management, risk multihazards, disasters

Abstract

The experiences and evidence generated at a global level from the efforts of prospective, corrective and reactive management of disaster risk for several years now; It has allowed us to understand that the multi-hazard and multi-hazard approaches must be integrated. This article seeks to present the conceptual framework of these approaches for their proper management by national systems and multidimensional security. Two categories classify the approaches, one of independent multihazards and a second of simultaneous multihazards and their possible interactions. The interaction of multihazards is based on three basic mechanisms: triggering, influence and coincidence. It is concluded that the current global scenarios and systemic risk dynamics lead to the mandatory need for countries to integrate multi-hazard and multi-hazard risk approaches into their policies, regulations, plans, programs and financing; multi-hazard approaches allow for improved strategies and actions for preparedness, response, rehabilitation and reconstruction; The multi-hazard risk approach provides, despite limited standardized conceptualization, an opportunity to improve disaster risk reduction as well as risk prevention. National risk management and civil defense systems must necessarily incorporate these approaches if they seek to meet the sustainable development goals. The multi-hazard and multi-hazard risk approaches will be part of the priorities that must be managed from multidimensional security.

Author Biography

  • Sergio Álvarez Gutiérrez, Organización Panamericana de Salud

    Doctor in Public Management and Governance. With post-doctorate in Social Responsibility, Ethics and Human Rights. Magister in Social Management with a mention in Management of Development Programs and Projects. Master in Management and Communication of Social and Solidarity Entities. Candidate for Master in Public Health. Trainer of Trainers and ESFERA Focal Point in Peru. Member of the United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination (UNDAC) teams. He has been Head of the National Defense and Disaster Risk Management Office, Coordinator of the Sectoral Emergency Operations Center and Technical Secretary of the Risk Management Working Group of the Ministry of Education. UNICEF Field Support Specialist in response to the earthquake in Haiti. Coordinator of the Disaster Risk Management and Humanitarian Aid Program for South America of Oxfam America. Director of the Directorate of Policies, Plans and Evaluation of the National Institute of Civil Defense. Advisor to the National Center for Estimation, Prevention and Reduction of Disaster Risk (CENEPRED). Teacher at CAEN, UNI, UPCH, UCV and UPC. He is currently an international consultant at the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO / WHO).

References

Gill, J. C., & Malamud, B. D. (2014). Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(4), 680-722. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000445

Liu, B., Siu, Y. L., & Mitchell, G. (2016). Hazard interaction analysis for multi-hazard risk assessment: a systematic classification based on hazard-forming environment. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(2), 629-642. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-629-2016

Tilloy, A., Malamud, B. D., Winter, H., & Joly-Laugel, A. (2019). A review of quantification methodologies for multi-hazard interrelationships. Earth-Science Reviews, 196, 102881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102881

Mimura, N., Yasuhara, K., Kawagoe, S., Yokoki, H., & Kazama, S. (2011). Damage from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami-a quick report. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 16(7), 803-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9297-7

Kappes, M. S., Keiler, M., von Elverfeldt, K., & Glade, T. (2012). Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Natural hazards, 64(2), 1925-1958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0294-2

Gallina, V., Torresan, S., Critto, A., Sperotto, A., Glade, T., & Marcomini, A. (2016). A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment. Journal of environmental management, 168, 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011

Carpignano, A., Golia, E., Di Mauro, C., Bouchon, S., & Nordvik, J. P. (2009). A methodological approach for the definition of multi‐risk maps at regional level: first application. Journal of risk research, 12(3-4), 513-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903050269

Terzi, S., Torresan, S., Schneiderbauer, S., Critto, A., Zebisch, M., & Marcomini, A. (2019). Multi-risk assessment in mountain regions: A review of modelling approaches for climate change adaptation. Journal of environmental management, 232, 759-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.100

Luo, H., Zhang, L., Wang, H., & He, J. (2020). Multi-hazard vulnerability of buildings to debris flows. Engineering Geology, 279, 105859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105859

De Ruiter, M. C., De Bruijn, J. A., Englhardt, J., Daniell, J. E., de Moel, H., & Ward, P. J. (2021). The asynergies of structural disaster risk reduction measures: Comparing floods and earthquakes. Earth’s Future, 9(1), e2020EF001531. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001531

Downloads

Published

2023-04-30

How to Cite

Los multipeligros y el riesgo sistémico de las emergencias y desastres en la Multidimensionalidad de la Seguridad Nacional. (2023). Cuaderno De Trabajo, 22, 46-54. https://doi.org/10.58211/cdt.vi22.43

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.